Ivo Wallimann-Helmer

Prof. Dr. phil. in Environmental Humanities, Directeur de l'institut UniFR_ESH

photo

 ivo.wallimann-helmer@unifr.ch
 +41 26 300 8826
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-6340

Les principaux domaines de mon travail portent sur les questions conceptuelles et normatives de la justice dans l'action climatique et la protection de l'environnement, l'innovation technologique pour la durabilité, et la différenciation équitable des responsabilités dans la pratique environnementale et plus récemment dans les systèmes alimentaires. Mon intérêt principal concerne les conflits conceptuels entre les dimensions globales et intergénérationnelles de ces défis et la différenciation des responsabilités entre les agents concernés. Pour plus d'informations sur mes projets actuels, veuillez consulter le site : https://www.unifr.ch/env/fr/research/

Chargé·e de cours
Service de didactique et compétences numériques

PER 14 bu. 3.333.2
Ch. du Musée 4
1700 Fribourg
PER 14, 3.333.2
+41 26 300 8826

Professeur·e ordinaire
Département de géosciences

PER 14 bu. 3.333.2
Ch. du Musée 4
1700 Fribourg
PER 14, 3.333.2
Horaires de réception
+41 26 300 8826

Biographie

Etudes en philosophie et la langue allemandes. 2004-2012 différents postes au département de philosophie à l'Université de Zurich dans les domaines de la philosophie pratique. 2009-2019 chargé de cours en différentes domaines d'éthique dans différentes universités et écoles supérieures spécialisées. 2012-2015 post-doc au Centre d'éthique de l'Université de Zurich. 2010-2018, directeur du programme ASAE UZH. Depuis 2018 professeur en humanités environnementales à l'Université de Fribourg en tant que et depuis 2019 directeur de l'Institut UniFR_ESH.

Recherche et publications

  • A. Publications scientifique ORCID
    89 publications

    Klimawandel, Biodiversitätsverlust, Nachhaltigkeit und Suffizienzkriterien der Gerechtigkeit
    GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society (2023) | Article

    Just Climate Adaptation and Loss and Damage Action in an Emergency
    Le Climatoscope (2023) | Article

    Resilience and Nonideal Justice in Climate Loss and Damage Governance
    Global Environmental Politics (2023) | Article

    Towards a Practical Climate Ethics: Combining Two Approaches to Guide Ethical Decision-Making in Concrete Climate Governance Contexts
    Ethics, Policy {\&}amp$\mathsemicolon$ Environment (2023) | Article

    Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Strategie: Wie die saguf noch transformativer wird
    GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society (2023) | Article

    Synergien zwischen Biodiversitäts-und Klimaschutz für mehr Nachhaltigkeit und Gerechtigkeit
    GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society (2023) | Article

    Nachhaltiger Konsum im Rahmen der Gerechtigkeit , dans Wege zu einem nachhaltigen Konsum | Vers une consommation durable
    Ivo Wallimann-Helmer (2023) | Chapitre de livre

    Stichwort \textquotedblBerufsethos\textquotedbl , dans Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik
    Ivo Wallimann-Helmer (2023) | Article de presse

    Ein Modell zur Zuschreibung individueller Klimaschutzverantwortung , dans Responsibilisierung
    Ivo Wallimann-Helmer, Schübel Hanna, Heite Catrin, Magyar-Haas Veronika, Schär Clarissa, Wagner Greta (2023) | Chapitre de livre

    Justice in benefitting from carbon removal
    Global Sustainability (2023) | Article

  • Projets de recherche

    EurSafe 2021: Justice and Food Security in a Changing Climate
    Statut: Terminé

    Début 01.05.2021
    Fin 31.07.2021
    Financement FNS  Voir la fiche du projet
    The 2021 Conference of the European Society for Agriculture and Food Ethics (EurSafe) in Fribourg focuses on the ethical issues concerning food security in times of a changing climate. the global community aims to end hunger and malnutrition in all its forms by 2030. However, the number of chronically undernourished people increases continuously, and ongoing climate change is expected to aggravate the situation even more. Consequently, there is an urgent need for mitigation and adaptation strategies that reduce global emissions and readjust human systems to changing climatic conditions. Such strategies, however, come with their own challenges and could possibly interfere with the goal of food security, as the space for new technologies directly competes with the need for agricultural land. The papers and presentations of the EurSafe 2021 Conference will discuss these potential conflicts and synergies between food security and climate policies from an ethical perspective, following four core areas: (1) Climate mitigation and food security (2) Geoengineering, agriculture and land (3) Adapting agriculture to sustain food security (4) Animal ethics, veterinary ethics and food security Reflecting the ethical and social implications of climate change for food security is irremissible for informed decision-making within research and public policy. The conference aims to promote interdisciplinary and international exchange and provide a key step forward in providing solutions to these challenges.

    Principles for Ethical Decision-Making in Environmental Practice
    Statut: En cours

    Début 01.04.2021
    Fin 31.08.2025
    Financement FNS  Voir la fiche du projet
    Humanity is facing as many environmental challenges as ever before in its history. These urgent challenges range from anthropogenic climate change to resource depletion and demand immediate action. Such action raises major ethical concerns and conflicts involving diverse parties with often conflicting sustainability goals and interests. However, environmental ethics to date has mainly been preoccupied with general concerns such as understanding our relation to nonhuman nature and has approached specific environmental challenges, if at all, in a piecemeal and unsystematic fashion. The aim of this project is to develop a general ethical framework for analyzing, systematizing, and deciding upon the ethical issues emerging in environmental politics, management, and administration. Building upon the methodology of principlism well known from medical ethics the ultimate outcome of this project will be a textbook that integrates applied exercises, forms, and checklists ready for practical use to make the framework widely available and usable in environmental science practice and education. Our investigation starts from the basis that it is possible to define a core set of ethical principles forming common morality in many diverse contexts of environmental governance and practice. This core set of principles determines how to decide ethical conflicts when implementing sustainability goals in various governance contexts. Principlism holds that, depending on the context, the core set of principles must be specified and weighted differently, leading to different moral duties. In order to verify whether principlism as a methodology can be a general tool for ethical decision-making in environmental governance and exactly what principles it stipulates, we will investigate three case studies. Taken together, their analysis contributes to the final formulation of the framework for ethical decision-making. We start our investigation from the hypothesis that four principles extensively discussed in environmental ethical literature and highly relevant in international politics form the core set of ethical principles in environmental practice: A) the polluter-pays principle, B) the ability-to-pay principle, C) the equal-per-capita principle, and D) the procedural-involvement principle, meaning the fair democratic involvement of those affected. We will apply and reformulate these four principles in three case studies and different fields of environmental ethics and policy: 1. Climate Adaptation / Loss and Damage: The first case study concerns adaptation and loss and damage policy in reaction to increased environmental risks due to climate change. 2. Biodiversity and Alien Species: The second case study investigates the challenge of alien species management and the preservation of biodiversity in Europe and globally. 3. Wildlife protection and conservation: The third case study deals with wildlife protection and conservation with a special focus on cases in Namibia, where several competing wildlife conservation practices potentially cause varying ethical conflicts.

Enseignement et cours

Afficher dans le programme des cours